DYNAMICS OF MICRONUCLEI IN MOUSE SKIN FIBROBLASTS AFTER GAMMA IRRADIATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micronuclei (MN) were assessed in dermal fibroblasts from C3H HeJ and C57 Bl6 mice (6-10 mo of age) irradiated in vivo as a potential method of biodosimetry. Radiation-induced MN [per 1,000 binucleated (BN) cells], assessed in fibroblasts obtained 1 d post-irradiation, increased in a dose-dependent manner in the range of 1 - 10 Gy per single dose. Analysis at 1 wk post irradiation showed some attenuation of MN response in C3H HeJ male mice, suggesting partial recovery of DNA damage. This was not observed in C57 Bl6 mice. Monomicronucleated cells predominated in unirradiated fibroblasts, whereas in irradiated fibroblasts multimicronucleated cells predominated at dose levels above about 5 Gy (more than 1,000 MN per 1,000 BN cells). Modeling of the data indicate that assaying total MN in dermal fibroblasts from samples of irradiated skin taken up to 1 wk after irradiation can provide biodosimetric information (with an accuracy of 1-2 Gy) for doses up to at least 6 Gy with lesser accuracy at higher doses. Percentage of multimicronucleated cells may be useful as a substitute of total MN at the higher doses, but total percentage of micronucleated cells is of limited value as a substitute.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".