Biochemical components of advanced selections and raspberry cultivars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Commercially grown raspberry cultivars (Rubus idaeus L.) (Festival, Boyne, Nova and Killarney) and advanced selections (88–18, 88–117, 88–134, SJR942-7) from the University of Guelph and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) were evaluated for total antioxidant capacity, soluble solids content and acidity. The crude, hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant content of berries were measured using the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) method. Significant variations were observed among crude, hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant content of the different advanced selections. Selection 88–18, had the highest crude, hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant capacity, while SJR942-7 had the highest soluble solids. The study shows the importance of genetic background in determining the antioxidant potential in raspberry and the possibility of developing new lines rich in phytochemicals. Key words: Hydrophilic, lipophilic, total antioxidants, TEAC, Trolox, soluble solids
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".