MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prospective Study of Outcomes after Reduction Mammaplasty: Long-Term Follow-Up

2006· article· en· W2079922589 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Implant and Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMammaplastyBody mass indexOverweightProspective cohort studyAnthropometrySurgeryComplicationPopulationPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine whether the beneficial effects of reduction mammaplasty are maintained over the long term in a Canadian population and to determine whether reduction mammaplasty facilitates weight loss in the overweight patient. METHODS: The Short Form-36, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Symptom Inventory Questionnaire were used to assess 57 patients preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months and 21.5 months. Surgeons completed preoperative, operative, and postoperative patient assessment forms to collect anthropometric, procedural, and postoperative complication data. RESULTS: Stable and significant improvements were found in all three outcomes questionnaires when compared preoperatively and 6 and 21.5 months postoperatively. The Short Form-36 indicated significant improvements (p < 0.05) in seven of the eight health status domains and the physical summary score, suggesting that the procedure primarily benefits physical aspects of health. Scores also improved on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (p < 0.0001) and symptoms improved on the Symptom Inventory Questionnaire (p < 0.0001) in patients 6 and 21.5 months after reduction mammaplasty. The patients had significant health deficits preoperatively compared with the normal population. Preoperative mean Short Form-36 scores were significantly lower in several areas (p < 0.005). The health deficits were eliminated at 6 months and showed a normalization effect at 21.5 months. Patients with a body mass index greater than 27 kg/m (n = 26; 1 kg = 2.2 lbs.) showed a significant decrease in weight and body mass index at long-term follow-up at 21.5 months postoperatively (p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of reduction mammaplasty indicate that this procedure is an effective method to reduce or alleviate both physical and psychological symptoms associated with macromastia. This study shows that this procedure should be covered under Canadian medical insurance plans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it