MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079956894 · doi:10.1109/icip.2014.7025686

Multi-layer temporal graphical model for head pose estimation in real-world videos

2014· article· en· W2079956894 on OpenAlexaff
Meltem Demirkus, Doina Precup, James J. Clark, Tal Arbel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoseComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionProbabilistic logicFrame (networking)3D pose estimationGraphical modelHead (geology)Focus (optics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Set (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Head pose estimation has been receiving a lot of attention due to its wide range of possible applications. However, most approaches in the literature have focused on head pose estimation in controlled environments. Head pose estimation has recently begun to be applied to real-world environments. However, the focus has been on estimation from single images or video frames. Furthermore, most approaches frame the problem as classification into a set of coarse pose bins, rather than performing continuous pose estimation. The proposed multi-layer probabilistic temporal graphical model robustly estimates continuous head pose angle while leveraging the strengths of multiple features into account. Experiments performed on a large, real-world video database show that our approach not only significantly outperforms alternative head pose approaches, but also provides a pose probability assigned at each video frame, which permits robust temporal, probabilistic fusion of pose information over the entire video sequence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207