MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079992467 · doi:10.1002/2014je004654

Modeling seismic energy propagation in highly scattering environments

2015· article· en· W2079992467 on OpenAlexafffund
J. F. Blanchette-Guertin, C. L. Johnson, J. F. Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Planets · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCodaScatteringAttenuationGeologySeismic waveWaveletSeismologyComputational physicsEnergy (signal processing)Monte Carlo methodPhysicsGeophysicsAcousticsOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Meteoroid impacts over millions to billions of years can produce a highly fractured and heterogeneous megaregolith layer on planetary bodies such as the Moon that lack effective surface recycling mechanisms. The energy from seismic events on these bodies undergoes scattering in the fractured layer(s) and generates extensive coda wave trains that follow major seismic wave arrivals. The decay properties of these codas are affected by the planetary body's interior structure. To understand the propagation of seismic waves in such media, we model the transmission of seismic energy in highly scattering environments using an adapted phonon method. In this Monte Carlo simulation approach, we track a large number of seismic wavelets as they leave a source and we record the resulting ground deformation each time a wavelet reaches a surface receiver. Our method provides the first numerical global modeling of 3‐D scattering, with user‐defined power law distributions of scatterer length scales and frequency‐dependent intrinsic attenuation, under the assumption of 1‐D background velocity models. We model synthetic signals for simple, but highly scattering interior models and vary the model parameters independently to assess their individual effects on the coda. Results show that the magnitude of the decay times is most affected by the background velocity model, in particular the presence of shallow low‐velocity layers, the event source depth, and the intrinsic attenuation level. The decay times are also controlled to a lesser extent by the size‐frequency distribution of scatterers, the thickness of the scattering layer, and the impedance contrast at the scatterers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research PlanetsSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207