MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080041113 · doi:10.1089/vbz.2009.0065

Epidemiology of Colorado Tick Fever in Montana, Utah, and Wyoming, 1995–2003

2009· article· en· W2080041113 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Monica Brackney, Anthony A. Marfin, J. Erin Staples, Lorann Stallones, Thomas J. Keefe, William C. Black, Grant L. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueVector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Vectors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUtah Department of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsmyalgiaChillsIncidence (geometry)MedicineTickEpidemiologyPopulationRocky Mountain spotted feverMedical recordPublic healthPediatricsEnvironmental healthSurgeryVeterinary medicineInternal medicineVirologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colorado tick fever (CTF) is a biphasic, febrile illness caused by a Coltivirus and transmitted by the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni, in the western United States and Canada. Symptoms generally include acute onset of fever, headache, chills, and myalgias; illness often lasts for 3 weeks or more. Laboratory-confirmed cases of CTF were identified from public health department records in Montana, Utah, and Wyoming, and from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention diagnostic laboratory records. Additional descriptive epidemiologic data were obtained by medical record abstraction. Ninety-one cases were identified from 1995 to 2003, resulting in an overall annual incidence of 2.7 per 1,000,000 population. The annual incidence decreased over the 9-year study period. Cases were 2.5 times more frequent in males than females. The highest incidence of cases occurred in persons aged 51-70. Tick exposure prior to illness onset was reported in 90% of the cases in which a more detailed history was available. The most common symptoms were fever, headache, and myalgia; 18% of the case patients were hospitalized. While there has been an overall decline in the recognized incidence of CTF cases, the reasons for the decline are unknown. Possibilities include a reduced intensity of surveillance and a true decrease in incidence. As more people continue to visit, move to and work in endemic areas, CTF should be considered in anyone presenting with a febrile illness following tick exposure in an endemic area. Heightened awareness for the disease and tick prevention messages should be part of public health measures to further decrease the incidence of disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVector-Borne and Zoonotic DiseasesSame topicViral Infections and VectorsFrench-language works237,207