MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080060030 · doi:10.1063/1.4896989

Lie group analysis of a generalized Krichever-Novikov differential-difference equation

2014· article· en· W2080060030 on OpenAlexaff
D. Levi, Eugenio Ricca, Zora Thomova, P. Winternitz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNovikov self-consistency principleLie groupMathematicsLie theoryGroup (periodic table)Adjoint representationPure mathematicsPartial differential equationDifferential equationMathematical physicsMathematical analysisAlgebra over a fieldAdjoint representation of a Lie algebraPhysicsLie conformal algebraQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The symmetry algebra of the differential-difference equation \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\dot{u}_n = N/D$\end{document}u̇n=N/D with D = un+1 − un−1 and N = P(un)un+1un−1 + Q(un)(un+1 + un−1) + R(un), where P, Q, and R are arbitrary analytic functions is shown to have the dimension 1 ⩽ dimL ⩽ 5. When P, Q, and R are specific second order polynomials in un (depending on 6 constants) this is the integrable discretization of the Krichever–Novikov equation. We find 3 cases when the arbitrary functions are not polynomials and the symmetry algebra satisfies dimL = 2. These cases are shown not to be integrable. The symmetry algebras are used to reduce the equations to purely difference ones. The symmetry group is also used to impose periodicity un+N = un and thus to reduce the differential-difference equation to a system of N coupled ordinary three points difference equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207