MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080112733 · doi:10.1145/2332432.2332473

Brief announcement

2012· article· en· W2080112733 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityComputationComputer scienceConstant (computer programming)Fraction (chemistry)Nash equilibriumProtocol (science)Function (biology)Theoretical computer scienceChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmComputer networkMathematicsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe scalable algorithms for secure multiparty computation (SMPC). We assume a synchronous message passing communication model, but we do not assume the existence of a broadcast channel. Our main result holds for the case where there are n players, of which a 1/3-ε fraction are controlled by an adversary, for ε any positive constant. We describe an SMPC algorithm for this model that requires each player to send Õ(⁄n+mn + √n) messages and perform Õ(⁄n+mn + √n) computations to compute any function f, where m is the size of a circuit to compute f. We also consider a model where all players are rational. In this model, we describe a Nash equilibrium protocol that solves SMPC and requires each player to send Õ(⁄n+mn) messages and perform Õ(⁄n+mn) computations. These results significantly improve over past results for SMPC which require each player to send a number of bits and perform a number of computations that is Θ(n, m)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207