eNOS phosphorylation and translocation are altered in male but not female mice by increased activation of the Gα<sub>q</sub> protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is known about sex-dependent physiological and pathophysiological differences in cardiac endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression and activation. Therefore, we investigated cardiac morphology and eNOS protein expression, including its translocation-dependent activation and phosphorylation, in cardiac tissue of male and female wild-type mice and transgenic heart-failure mice having a cardiac-specific, 5-fold overexpression of the Galphaq protein. In addition, we measured calcineurin protein expression. Heart-to-body weight ratio was increased in Galphaq mice. Female wild-type mice showed higher eNOS protein expression and activation (translocation and phosphorylation) than did wild-type males. In cardiac tissue of Galphaq mice, these sex-dependent differences remained or were enhanced. Protein expression of the catalytic subunit calcineurin A, which has been shown to dephosphorylate eNOS, was higher in wild-type males than in wild-type females. These differences were increased in the Galphaq mice model. We conclude that sex differences exist in cardiac eNOS protein expression and phosphorylation. Increased activation of the Galphaq protein appears to alter eNOS protein expression and phosphorylation only in males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".