MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080152724 · doi:10.1134/s2079059711030026

Intraspecific polymorphism of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene fragment of the chum salmon (Oncorhynchus Keta Walbaum) from the rivers of eastern Kamchatka and the northern coast of the Sea of Okhotsk

2011· article· en· W2080152724 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. T. Bachevskaya, В. В. Переверзева

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Genetics Applied Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Industry and Aquatic Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytochrome bNucleotide diversityOncorhynchusBiologyMitochondrial DNAIntraspecific competitionGenetic diversityHaplotypePopulationGeneZoologyFisheryGeneticsFish <Actinopterygii>GenotypeDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nucleotide sequence of a gene fragment of cytochrome b ( cytb ) was determined, and data on the variability of this mtDNA region in chum salmon from certain populations on the northern coast of the Sea of Okhotsk and eastern Kamchatka populations were obtained. It was shown that the Kamchatka chum salmon population is characterized by the lowest values of nucleotide (π) and haplotype (h) diversity. The higher level of genetic diversity of the Sea of Okhotsk population is most likely due to the history of formation and distribution. Statistically significant ( p < 0.001) genetic differences (Fst) between the studied groups of populations were found. The Okhotsk and Kamchatka chum salmon populations differ from the Canada chum salmon population in the structure of the cytb gene and the amino acid sequence of the studied fragment of this enzyme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Genetics Applied ResearchSame topicFood Industry and Aquatic BiologyFrench-language works237,207