Synthesis and organic group transfer of organodiplatinum complex with a 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane ligand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of homometallic alkyl- and phenyldinuclear complexes containing one platinum–platinum bond, (dppe)RPt–Pt(η5-Cp)(CO) (R = Me, Et, CH2CMe3, Ph), have been prepared by oxidative addition of the Pt–C bond of PtR(η5-Cp) to Pt(styrene)(dppe), and were characterized by spectroscopic methods and (or) X-ray structure analysis. The geometry at Pt with a dppe ligand is square planar, and the carbonyl and Cp ligand of the Pt(η5-Cp)(CO) moiety lie orthogonal to the coordination plane of former platinum. Competitive organic group transfer reactions along the Pt–Pt bond in these complexes took place to give PtR(η5-Cp)(CO) and PtR(η1-Cp)(dppe) on thermolysis. Alkyl or aryl transfer from Pt with a dppe ligand were enhanced by addition of olefin, whereas treatment with CO and tertiary phosphine ligands causes Cp transfer from Pt(η5-Cp)(CO).Key words: organoplatinum–platinum complex, organic group transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".