MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080166813 · doi:10.1037/cjbs2007_2_110

A more accurate approach to measuring the prevalence of sexual harassment among high school students.

2007· article· en· W2080166813 on OpenAlex
Margaret Walsh, Jim Duffy, Joanne Gallagher-Duffy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersStatus of Women Canada
KeywordsHarassmentHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presente etude s'est penchee sur la prevalence du harcelement sexuel chez les etudiants de l'ecole secondaire. En tout 1 582 etudiants de 18 ecoles ont repondu a une version de l'enquete de l'American Association of University Women (1993). Les evenements de harcelement sexuel signales ont ete limites a ceux qui: a) l'avaient vecu directement, b) s'etaient produits au cours des deux semaines precedentes et c) ont ete signales par des etudiants qui etaient vraisemblablement perturbes par leurs experiences. Malgre cette approche rigoureuse, il a ete trouve que le harcelement sexuel representait un probleme important dans les ecoles secondaires. Quinze pour cent des etudiants avaient ete victimes de harcelement sexuel et etaient tres ou assez perturbes par leurs experiences d'harcelement. Pres de la moitie de ces etudiants perturbes avaient fait l'objet de formes physiques de harcelement sexuel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it