MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080171336 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-5620

Abstract 5620: Novel phage display-derived neuroblastoma-targeting peptides potentiate the effect of drug nanocarriers in preclinical settings.

2013· article· en· W2080171336 on OpenAlexaff
Monica Loi, Daniela Di Paolo, Marco Soster, Chiara Brignole, Alice Bartolini, Laura Emionite, Jessica D. Sun, Pamela Becherini, Flavio Curnis, Andrea Petretto, Monica Sani, Alessandro Gori, Claudio Gambini, Renato Longhi, Michele Cilli, Theresa M. Allen, Federico Bussolino, Wadih Arap, Renata Pasqualini, Angelo Corti, Mirco Ponzoni, Serena Marchiò, Fabio Pastorino

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroblastomaIn vivoNanocarriersPhage displayCancer researchEx vivoIn vitroDoxorubicinBiologyMolecular biologyCell cultureChemistryPharmacologyPeptideDrugBiochemistryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Molecular targeting of drug delivery nanocarriers is expected to improve their therapeutic index while decreasing their toxicity. The identification of novel peptide ligands specific for cells present in high-risk neuroblastoma, a childhood tumor mostly refractory to current therapies, is needed. Experimental design: We performed combined in vitro/ex-vivo phage display screenings on human neuroblastoma cell lines and on tumors derived from orthotopic mouse models of human neuroblastoma. Binding validation and homing in vivo of selected phage clones were tested by immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescent analyses. Cell association experiments in vitro with the corresponding synthetic biotin-labeled peptides were performed. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo tumor accumulation and therapeutic experiments were performed using peptide-targeted, doxorubicin-loaded, nanocarriers. Results: By designing proper subtractive protocols, we identified phage clones specific either for the primary tumor, its metastases, or for the stromal components. Globally, we isolated 121 phage-displayed neuroblastoma-binding peptides; of these, 26 bound the primary tumor, 15 the metastatic mass, 57 and 23 their respective microenvironments. Of these, five phage clones were further validated for their specific binding ex-vivo to biopsies from stage IV neuroblastoma patients and to neuroblastoma tumors derived from mice. All five clones also targeted tumor cells and vasculature in vivo when injected into neuroblastoma-bearing mice. Coupling of the corresponding targeting peptides with doxorubicin-loaded nanocarriers led to a significant inhibition in tumor volume and enhanced survival in preclinical neuroblastoma models. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that novel ligands of neuroblastoma-associated markers are functional in the design of nanocarriers with therapeutic efficacy paving the way to their clinical development. Citation Format: Monica Loi, Daniela Di Paolo, Marco Soster, Chiara Brignole, Alice Bartolini, Laura Emionite, Jessica Sun, Pamela Becherini, Flavio Curnis, Andrea Petretto, Monica Sani, Alessandro Gori, Claudio Gambini, Renato Longhi, Michele Cilli, Theresa M. Allen, Federico Bussolino, Wadih Arap, Renata Pasqualini, Angelo Corti, Mirco Ponzoni, Serena Marchiò, Fabio Pastorino. Novel phage display-derived neuroblastoma-targeting peptides potentiate the effect of drug nanocarriers in preclinical settings. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5620. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-5620

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207