From genes to neural tube defects (NTDs): Insights from multiscale computational modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The morphogenetic movements, and the embryonic phenotypes they ultimately produce, are the consequence of a series of events that involve signaling pathways, cytoskeletal components, and cell- and tissue-level mechanical interactions. In order to better understand how these events work together in the context of amphibian neurulation, an existing multiscale computational model was augmented. Geometric data for this finite element-based mechanical model were obtained from 3D surface reconstructions of live axolotl embryos and serial sections of fixed specimens. Tissue mechanical properties were modeled using cell-based constitutive equations that include internal force generation and cell rearrangement, and equation parameters were adjusted manually to reflect biochemical changes including alterations in Shroom or the planar-cell-polarity pathway. The model indicates that neural tube defects can arise when convergent extension of the neural plate is reduced by as little as 20%, when it is eliminated on one side of the embryo, when neural ridge elevation is disrupted, when tension in the non-neural ectoderm is increased, or when the ectoderm thickness is increased. Where comparable conditions could be induced in Xenopus embryos, good agreement was found, an important step in model validation. The model reveals the neurulating embryo to be a finely tuned biomechanical system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".