MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080176619 · doi:10.1136/bmj.g2482

Families affected by heart disease in India spend over a quarter of income on healthcare, report shows

2014· letter· en· W2080176619 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Travasso

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Health careDiseaseMedicineDemographic economicsBusinessSocioeconomicsGeographyEconomicsEconomic growthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Households in India affected by cardiovascular disease spent 27.2% of their total household budget on out-of-pocket healthcare expenses compared with 10.7% in the matched controls over a 15 day reference period (P<0.01), a new survey has shown. The study, which was published in Tropical Medicine and International Health ,1 used information from India’s National Sample Survey Office from 2004 to estimate the economic burden of cardiovascular disease in Indian homes. The study also showed that hospital admissions from households that had a family member with heart disease cost 4.5 times more each year than admissions from families that had no heart disease. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207