Interactions between cortisol and Rhesus glycoprotein expression in ureogenic toadfish, <i>Opsanus beta</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In their native environment, gulf toadfish excrete equal quantities of ammonia and urea. However, upon exposure to stressful conditions in the laboratory (i.e. crowding, confinement or air exposure), toadfish decrease branchial ammonia excretion and become ureotelic. The objective of this study was to determine the influences of cortisol and ammonia on ammonia excretion relative to expression of Rhesus (Rh) glycoproteins and the ammonia-fixing enzyme, glutamine synthetase (GS). In vivo infusions and/or injections were used to manipulate corticosteroid activity and plasma ammonia concentrations in ureotelic toadfish. Metyrapone treatment to lower circulating cortisol levels resulted in a 3.5-fold elevation of ammonia excretion rates, enhanced mRNA expression of two of the toadfish Rh isoforms (Rhcg1 and Rhcg2), and decreased branchial and hepatic GS activity. Correspondingly, cortisol infusion decreased ammonia excretion 2.5-fold, a change that was accompanied by reduced branchial expression of all toadfish Rh isoforms (Rhag, Rhbg, Rhcg1 and Rhcg2) and a twofold increase in hepatic GS activity. In contrast, maintenance of high circulating ammonia levels by ammonia infusion enhanced ammonia excretion and Rh expression (Rhag, Rhbg and Rhcg2). Toadfish treated with cortisol showed an attenuated response to ammonia infusion with no change in Rh mRNA expression or GS activity. In summary, the evidence suggests that ammonia excretion in toadfish is modulated by cortisol-induced changes in both Rh glycoprotein expression and GS activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".