MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080269875 · doi:10.1542/neo.13-7-e401

Hypertension in the Neonate

2012· article· en· W2080269875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeoReviews · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineBlood pressurePediatricsDiseaseNormativeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in our ability to identify, evaluate, and care for premature infants have lead to an increased awareness of hypertension in the NICU. A few recent studies have provided additional information on blood pressure values over the first month after birth and on other intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence blood pressure in the neonatal period. The cause of hypertension in an affected neonate is usually obvious after a focused evaluation, with thromboembolism, kidney diseases, and chronic lung disease accounting for most cases. Individual clinical judgment must be relied on to decide on the most appropriate approach to treatment, with some infants needing either intravenous or oral antihypertensive medications. Remaining challenges include the lack of large-scale normative data, lack of evidence-based treatment recommendations, and a paucity of information on long-term outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it