MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080270161 · doi:10.1177/135245850100700606

Baló's concentric sclerosis: surviving normal myelin in a patient with a relapsing-remitting clinical course

2001· article· en· W2080270161 on OpenAlexaff
George R. Moore, K. Berry, Joël Oger, Alister J.E. Prout, D A Graeb, R A Nugent

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisMyelinRemyelinationConcentricLesionPathologyPathogenesisMedicineCentral nervous systemImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Baló's concentric sclerosis is a demyelinating disorder in which bands of demyelination alternate with concentric bands of myelin preservation. The pathogenesis of the lesion is unknown. Previous reports using modern histopathologic techniques have shown the bands of myelin preservation to be comprised of remyelinated or partially demyelinated myelin. Here we report a case of Baló's concentric sclerosis in a 24-year-old East Indian patient with a previous history of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Pathologically, the bands of myelin preservation showed myelin sheaths of normal thickness, with focal areas of demyelination. The findings, taken together with those of previously reported cases, suggest that Baló's concentric sclerosis is a variant of MS, and the concentric lesion may be an intermediary form in evolution of a chronic active MS plaque. The pathogenesis of this concentric lesion may be explained by periodic suppression of demyelination in the rapidly expanding border, allowing remyelination or only transient incomplete demyelination to occur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis JournalSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207