MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2080274563 · doi:10.1139/e99-114

Hurricanes Pauline and Nora rainwater chemical composition

2000· article· en· W2080274563 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hugo Padilla, R. Bélmont, M. B. Torres, A. Báez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRainwater harvestingChemical compositionHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceSampling (signal processing)GeologySeawaterOceanographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rainwater from hurricanes Pauline and Nora was sampled for chemical analysis at the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Rainwater sampling under extreme conditions presents a unique opportunity to study oceanic rain chemical composition. An excess sulphate ((SO2–4)xs) as low as 0% was measured near the centre of hurricane Pauline in Huatulco Bays. Another remarkable result was obtained in another rainwater sample of Pauline rain bands with a total SO2–4 concentration below the detection limit. Also, Na+ and Cl– concentrations were extremely low (0.02 and 0.025 mg L–1, respectively). The explanation of these results is also presented. Some light rains were also collected in Tapachula while Pauline was severely affecting Huatulco Bays. Only rainwater samples from hurricane Nora outer rain bands were sampled in Manzanillo, where it was interesting to evaluate the profound impact that a single power plant had on the chemical composition of hurricane Nora rains. Excess sulphate did not correlate with Mg2+ in Huatulco Bays and Manzanillo. However, it correlated with Mg2+ in Tapachula, even though this town is located 27 km from the coast. A further oxidation of organic sulphur containing compounds combined with a simultaneous transport of sea spray inland is proposed to explain this correlation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→