La théorie du complot comme un simulacre de sciences sociales ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L’objectif de cet article est de comprendre la puissance de l’imaginaire conspirationniste qui agit sur la sociologie critique. Pour clarifier cette puissance, nous allons, en introduisant les débats autour du travail sociologique de P. Bourdieu, dégager d’abord la raison pour laquelle la sociologie critique et rationnelle est susceptible d’être tombée dans le complotisme. Ensuite, nous allons étudier certaines des conditions sociales qui sont favorables à la production de la théorie du complot. Celle-ci ne s’efface pas dans la société contemporaine prétendue rationnalisée, car l’imaginaire du complot continue d’exercer sa force négative sur la vie sociale. Ce que la théorie du complot nous démontre finalement, c’est un réenchantement négatif du monde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it