MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080306513 · doi:10.1145/588646.588649

Benefits and strategies of implementing educational software site licenses

2002· article· en· W2080306513 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gordana Brouilette, Cindy Stewart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Education and E-Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)SoftwareSession (web analytics)Software reviewService (business)Computer scienceSoftware peer reviewEngineering managementSoftware engineeringEducational softwareSoftware deploymentWorld Wide WebSoftware developmentEngineeringSoftware constructionBusinessOperating systemMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Educational Software Site Licensing has become an integral component of IT services on many campuses today. Our department, Computing and Network Services (CNS) at the University of Alberta has developed long-standing working relationships with a wide variety of software vendors. As a result we are able to provide our University of Alberta clients (teaching, administration, research and students) with valuable and economical educational software. The range of software is from everyday desktop to specialized applications. This session will explain how the University of Alberta has evolved into the Educational Software Site Licensing business. It will address how it has grown to be a corner stone service as well as what services we presently provide. The topics to be covered are:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpen Education and E-LearningFrench-language works237,207