Prediction of Local Heat Transfer in a Vertical Cavity Using Artificial Neutral Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A time-averaging technique was developed to measure the unsteady and turbulent free convection heat transfer in a tall vertical enclosure using a Mach–Zehnder interferometer. The method used a combination of a digital high speed camera and an interferometer to obtain the local time-averaged heat flux in the cavity. The measured values were used to train an artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm to predict the local heat transfer. The time-averaged local Nusselt number is needed to study local phenomena, e.g., condensation in windows. Optical heat transfer measurements were made in a differentially heated vertical cavity with isothermal walls. The cavity widths were W=12.7 mm, 32.3 mm, 40 mm, and 56.2 mm. The corresponding Rayleigh numbers were about 3×103, 5×104, 1×105, and 2.7×105, respectively, and the enclosure aspect ratio (H/W) ranged from A=18 to 76. The test fluid was air and the temperature differential was about 15 K for all measurements. ALYUDA NEUROINTELLIGENCE (version 2.2) was used to generate solutions for the time-averaged local Nusselt number in the cavity based on the experimental data. Feed-forward architecture and training by the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm were adopted. The ANN was designed to suit the present system, which had 4–13 inputs and one output. The network predictions were found to be in a good agreement with the experimental local Nusselt number values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".