Sympathoinhibitory and Depressor Effects of Amlodipine in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors examined whether central actions contribute to the hypotensive effects of peripherally administered amlodipine, a lipophilic dihydropyridine with slow onset and long duration of action. After 5 to 6 weeks of high (8%, H-Na) or regular (0.6%, R-Na) salt intake, changes in renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded at rest and in response to intravenous (iv) and intracerebroventricular (icv) injection, and prolonged iv infusion of amlodipine, in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Iv injection of amlodipine at 50 to 100 microg/kg decreased MAP but increased RSNA and HR in a dose-related manner. In contrast, icv injection of amlodipine at 10 to 50 microg/kg caused parallel decreases in MAP, RSNA, and HR. Iv infusion of amlodipine at 50 microg/kg per hour for 3 hours followed by 100 microg/kg per hour for 2 hours also decreased in parallel RSNA, MAP, and HR. Maximal decreases in RSNA, MAP, and HR in response to icv injection and iv infusion were significantly larger in SHR on H-Na versus R-Na. All responses lasted at least 1 hour following iv and icv injection, or after the termination of iv infusion of amlodipine. These data suggest that in SHR during prolonged iv infusion, amlodipine appears to cross the blood-brain barrier, block brain l-type Ca2+ channels, and decrease sympathetic outflow and thereby BP. Central actions may prevail during iv infusion of amlodipine at low rates, and the decrease in BP is associated with sympathoinhibition. High salt intake markedly enhances its sympathoinhibitory action, likely through central mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".