MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080331873 · doi:10.1007/s10909-008-9738-1

TES Bolometer Array for the APEX-SZ Camera

2008· article· hu· W2080331873 on OpenAlexaff
J. Mehl, P. A. R. Ade, Kaustuv Basu, Daniel Becker, A. N. Bender, F. Bertoldi, H. M. Cho, M. Dobbs, N. W. Halverson, W. L. Holzapfel, R. Güsten, James E. Kennedy, R. Kneißl, E. Kreysa, T. Lanting, A. T. Lee, M. Lueker, K. M. Menten, D. Muders, M. Nord, F. Pacaud, T. Plagge, P. L. Richards, P. Schilke, D. Schwan, H. Spieler, A. Weiß, Martin White

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Low Temperature Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNuclear PhysicsOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBolometerTransition edge sensorSquidPhysicsTelescopeApex (geometry)South Pole TelescopeMultiplexingGalaxyOpticsGalaxy clusterAstronomyDetectorComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We will report on the APEX-SZ bolometer camera which houses a 320 element Transition-Edge Sensor (TES) bolometer array designed to survey for galaxy clusters using the 12-meter diameter APEX telescope sited in Chile. Design and fabrication of the TES bolometer array will be discussed, as well as its integration with a frequency-domain SQUID multiplexed readout system. The full configuration of the APEX-SZ camera was deployed in April 2007. A preliminary galaxy cluster map from this deployment will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Low Temperature PhysicsSame topicSuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyFrench-language works237,207