La construction de l’islamité et l’intégration sociale des musulmans selon la perspective des leaders musulmans au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur s’intéresse aux processus de construction d’une islamite québécoise. Dans cet article, il analyse tout d’abord la conception de l’intégration à la société québécoise dans le discours que les leaders musulmans adressent à leurs coreligionnaires. Cette conception de l’intégration prend appui sur une interprétation de ce que doivent être les relations entre musulmans et non-musulmans, sur une perception particulière des politiques d’intégration canadienne et québécoise et sur une volonté de consolider le plus possible la communauté musulmane. L’auteur examine par la suite les effets de la politique d’« accommodement raisonnable » en vigueur au Québec et s’interroge sur les effets pervers potentiels de celle-ci, eu égard à la tendance au repli communautaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".