MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080342283 · doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6364493

Highway multihop broadcast protocols for vehicular networks

2012· article· en· W2080342283 on OpenAlexaff
Mohssin Barradi, Abdelhakim Hafid, Sultan Aljahdali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcast radiationComputer networkComputer scienceVehicular ad hoc networkAtomic broadcastMultimedia Broadcast Multicast ServiceBroadcast communication networkWirelessBroadcast domainNode (physics)IEEE 802.11pIntelligent transportation systemWireless ad hoc networkBroadcasting (networking)TelecommunicationsMulticastNetwork packetEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IEEE 802.11p Wireless Access in the Vehicular Environment (WAVE) standard is being developed, in order to support Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) applications including safety applications. This includes data exchange between vehicles (V2V), and between vehicles and infrastructure (V2I). Safety applications, e.g., collision and other safety warnings, rely on broadcast communication. Unfortunately, 802.11p does not allow mechanisms such as sending RTS/CTS and acknowledgements for broadcast communication. Therefore, several collisions can be caused by hidden nodes/vehicles. Moreover, the possibility of using the binary exponential back-off technique to reduce congestion is not supported due to the lack of acknowledgements. In this paper, we propose a new 802.11 based Vehicular Multi-hop Broadcast protocol, called Highway Multihop Broadcast (HMB) that addresses the broadcast storm, hidden node, and reliability problems of multi-hop broadcast in VANET. HMB selects the farthest vehicle, with the least speed deviation with respect to the source, to forward and acknowledge broadcast frames. Simulation results show that HMB has a very high success rate in delivering safety messages, and efficient channel utilization when compared with existing broadcast based protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207