MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080397322 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450850405

Characteristics‐Based Model Predictive Control of a Catalytic Flow Reversal Reactor

2007· article· en· W2080397322 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Plug flow reactor modelFlow (mathematics)Mass flowPlug flowMethaneCombustionEngineeringProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMechanicsChemistryContinuous stirred-tank reactorControl (management)PhysicsChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes the formulation and tuning of a model‐based controller for a catalytic flow reversal reactor (CFRR). A plug flow non‐linear pseudo‐homogeneous mathematical representation of the process is used to model the mass and energy transport phenomena for the model‐based controller. A combination of the method of characteristics and model predictive control (MPC) technology is used to formulate the controller (Shang et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 (9) 2140–2149 (2004)). Mass extraction from the midsection of the reactor is used as the manipulated variable. Numerical simulations are used to show the performance of the formulated controller. The performance of the controller is evaluated on a simulated catalytic flow reversal reactor unit for combustion of lean methane streams for reduction of greenhouse gases emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it