MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2080455527 · doi:10.1353/his.0.0057

Accounting for Violence at the Victoria Industrial School

2009· article· fr· W2080455527 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Bryan Hogeveen

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperClosure (psychology)CriminologyInstitutionPolitical sciencePsychologyPublic relationsSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les garçons qui ont été détenus à la Victoria Industrial School (VIS) entre son ouverture en 1887 et sa fermeture en 1934 subissaient souvent des châtiments extrêmes, violents et capricieux et faisaient fait l'objet de manipulations psychologiques calculées. La violence qui leur était faite et les motifs qu'invoquaient les représentants de l'école pour justifier de telles pratiques préjudiciables sont examinés par l'entremise de dossiers de cas, d'enquêtes publiques, de reportages dans les journaux, de révélations d'anciens détenus, de déclarations défensives par les directeurs et de confessions par le personnel. L'étude de ces sources semble indiquer qu'en dépit de recommandations répétées du conseil municipal de Toronto, du public et de commissions d'enquête, les châtiments violents persistèrent. Malgré les affirmations du contraire, la VIS a été, pour bien des garçons, un établissement cruel et impitoyable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire sociale→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→