MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080474725 · doi:10.1177/1533317507302320

Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia Associated With a New Mutation V363I in Tau Gene

2007· article· en· W2080474725 on OpenAlexaff
David G. Muñoz, Raquel Ros, Marta Fatas, Fẽlix Bermejo, Justo Garcı́a de Yébenes

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenetranceGeneticsAphasiaPsychologyMissense mutationExonApraxiaMutationAudiologyMedicineBiologyGeneNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reported here is a new missense mutation V363I in exon 12 of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene associated with progressive nonfluent aphasia, with onset at the age of 69 years in a woman. Although near mute, she maintained complex activities and had no discernible deficits outside of language until the age of 75 years, when progressive gait and swallowing disturbances appeared. There was a history of late-onset aphasia and apraxia in her father. All of her children were asymptomatic adults, but psycholinguistic abnormalities were detected in those bearing the mutation, consisting of difficulties in comprehension, both reading (symbol discrimination and comprehension of oral spelling) and oral (matching sentences to pictures and comprehension of locative relationships). A mutation-bearing sibling showed no abnormalities at 70 years old, consistent with the limited penetrance expected in late-onset disease. The mutation, corresponding to a highly conserved residue in the fourth tubulin-binding repeat, was not present in 194 normal individuals with the same genetic background.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias®Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207