A genetic algorithm heuristic approach to general outsourcing capacitated production planning problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses a dynamic capacitated production planning (CPP) problem with consideration of outsourcing. Specifically, the outsourcing problem considered in this paper has the following features: (1) all demands are met by production or outsourcing without postponement or backlog, (2) production, inventory, and outsourcing levels all have a limit, and (3) the cost functions are considered arbitrarily and time-varying. These features come together, leading to a so-called general outsourcing CPP problem. In our previous work, an algorithm with pseudo-polynomial time complexity was developed, which includes a formation of a feasible solution region and then a search procedure using dynamic programming techniques. Due to the computational complexity with such an approach, only small and medium problems can be solved in a practical sense. In this paper, we present a genetic algorithm (GA) approach to the same problem. The novelty of this GA approach is that the idea of the feasible solution region is used as a heuristic to guide the searching process. We present a computational experiment to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".