MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080527674 · doi:10.2118/77825-ms

Overview of Stimulation Technology for Horizontal Completions without Cemented Casing in the Lateral

2002· article· en· W2080527674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. W. McDaniel, Loyd East, Vance Hazzard

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringWorkoverCasingPermeability (electromagnetism)Well stimulationDirectional drillingGeologyHydraulic fracturingWellboreCompletion (oil and gas wells)DrillingGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringReservoir engineeringPetroleumMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many horizontal wells have been drilled in low- to moderate-permeability formations and completed in a manner that assumed there would not be a need for a true "stimulation" treatment. This has been a widespread occurrence in both the U.S.A. and Canada, and to a lesser extent for other locations around the globe. Completing the horizontal section either openhole or with a noncemented liner is economically attractive. However, in many low-permeability reservoirs, and some with moderate-permeability values, production has often been below expectations and sometimes commercially unfeasible, even following efforts to overcome near-wellbore damage problems. This is especially true when considering only completions in reservoirs other than fractured chalks. In more permeable reservoirs, the higher investment costs of underbalanced drilling have often allowed low-damage completions with good economic return. In lower permeability reservoirs, this approach has not often been successful. Previous studies offer numerous success stories for stimulating cased/cemented horizontal completions in low-permeability reservoirs.1-8 To achieve proper stimulation with a technique such as fracture-acidizing or hydraulic fracturing with proppants, operators must incorporate an economical, effective method for controlling fluid or proppant placement. However, operators faced with limited producing potential need to reduce well costs, so they often consider openhole or simple liner completions a necessity. Unfortunately, few proven technologies exist for controlling fracture placement in noncemented wellbores. In some cases, high risk or very high cost is associated with these technologies, depending on reservoir conditions or the potential for production improvement. In attempting to solve these problems, operators have used several approaches. Some have succeeded both mechanically and economically; some have only been mechanical successes, while others have fallen short on both considerations. To achieve significant long-term production improvement, conventional proppant-laden fracturing treatments, waterfracs (those using very little proppant), and fracture-acidizing of carbonate formations all need some type of control over fracture placement along the horizontal. This paper examines several approaches used in attempting to solve these problems and analyzes the reasons why each succeeded or failed mechanically and/or economically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and ExhibitionSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207