MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080557359 · doi:10.1115/imece2004-60465

Real-Time Adaptive Modeling Approach to Compensate the Thermal Deformation of Nonlinear Machine Tool Structures

2004· article· en· W2080557359 on OpenAlexafffund
Steven Fraser, Helmi Attia, M. O. M. Osman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNonlinear systemMachiningMachine toolControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceNoise (video)Displacement (psychology)Finite element methodThermalMechanical engineeringEngineeringStructural engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine tool structures cannot be fully optimized at the design stage to cover the wide range of operating conditions. Therefore, reliable control systems emerge as the logical solution to compensate for thermal errors. Due to the difficulty of measuring the relative thermal displacement δ between the tool and the workpiece during machining, δ has to be accurately estimated in real-time. A new concept of adaptive modeling is introduced to develop control-based dynamic models to predict and compensate for thermal deformation of nonlinear complex machine tool structures. A key element of this approach is to replace the changes in the contact pressures along the joint by fictitious contact heat sources FCHS. This allows us to track the system nonlinearity through temperature measurements and real-time inverse heat conduction IHCP solution. The proposed approach dealt successfully with a number of challenges; namely, the non-uniqueness of the problem, and the lack of sufficient conditions to identify each of such unusual FCHS separately. The results showed that the models are capable of satisfying the accuracy, stability and computational efficiency requirements, even when the temperature measurement signal is contaminated with random noise. The results also showed that the thermal deformation transfer function behaves as low-pass filters, and as such it attenuates the high frequency noise associated with temperature measurement error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207