A Vector-controlled Single-phase Voltage Source Inverter Based Grid Interface Suitable for Variable Frequency Operation in Autonomous Microgrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vector (dq) control is a powerful technique used in high dynamic performance inverters. The transformation of AC into DC quantities allows one to get zero steady-state error for AC currents and voltages with simple proportional integrator type controllers. It can easily be implemented for three-phase inverters but presents some challenges for single-phase ones. The orthogonal component (β) required for the stationary to rotating frame transformation is usually created by phase shifting the real one (α) by one-quarter of a line cycle, which deteriorates the dynamic response. The emulation of a fictive orthogonal circuit for obtaining the β current component has been shown to yield enhanced transient response. This article shows that the dynamic response of vector-controlled single-phase inverters implemented with orthogonal circuit emulation is identical to that of a three-phase inverter. This concept is then extended for operation with variable grid frequencies, a condition that can be found in photovoltaic hybrid autonomous microgrids, where the grid frequency is used for energy management purposes. The effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated by means of simulation and experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".