Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada’s key role in supporting the 2009 coup d’état in Honduras is emblematic of a new Canadian imperialist positioning in world affairs. A close reading of Canadian state responses to the coup and the repression that followed points to the apparent contradiction in its being an outspoken supporter of a violent and antidemocratic regime despite rhetorical commitments to peace and security. The contradiction can be explained in terms of the extent of Canadian economic investment in Honduras and an understanding of Canada as a secondary imperial power committed to imposing and maintaining conditions in Honduras that will protect that investment. The promotion of hyper-neoliberalism in Honduras, then, is representative of Canada’s larger projects for the Global South in a context in which Canadian capital is aggressively expanding its reach. Shipley (número abierto de septiembre) El rol clave de Canadá en apoyar el golpe de estado en Honduras es emblemático de un nuevo posicionamiento imperialista canadiense en los asuntos mundiales. Una lectura detallada de respuestas gubernamentales canadienses al golpe y la subsiguiente represión señala su aparente contradicción entre ser un abierto defensor de un régimen violento y antidemocrático a pesar de los compromisos retóricos con la paz y la seguridad. Se puede explicar la contradicción en términos del alcance de la inversión económica canadiense en Honduras y una percepción de Canadá como un poder imperial secundario comprometido con imponer y mantener condiciones en Honduras que protegerían esa inversión. Promover el hiper-neoliberalismo en Honduras es entonces representador de los proyectos mayores de Canadá para el Sur Global en un contexto donde el capital canadiense está ampliando su alcance de manera agresiva.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".