MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080593375 · doi:10.1121/1.4785292

The computation of rough surface scattering from a finite interval of roughness

2004· article· en· W2080593375 on OpenAlexaff
John A. Fawcett

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperposition principleComputationScatteringInterval (graph theory)Surface roughnessSurface finishMathematical analysisSurface (topology)MathematicsGeometryPhysicsOpticsAlgorithmMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The computation of scattering from a rough, pressure-release surface is a problem of much interest in many applications. In this paper, the exact numerical solution of scattering from a finite interval of roughness is considered. This interval is a portion of an otherwise flat surface that is infinite in extent. One numerical approach is to consider a truncated infinite integral equation. However, unless one is willing to use large computational intervals, perhaps far exceeding the extent of the roughness, the solution to the truncated problem may not approximate the infinite interval solution very well for some situations. In this paper, a system of equations is derived for a closed curve including the interval of roughness and a portion of the curve in the surrounding fluid. The system is solved using the method of wavefield superposition. The method is applicable to the case of both positive and negative deformations of the flat surface. As well, the method is easily extendable to the case that the roughness is part of an upper surface of a waveguide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207