MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080621259 · doi:10.1002/apj.5500080315

Dynamic Simulation and Control of an MTBE Catalytic Distillation Column

2000· article· en· W2080621259 on OpenAlexaff
Hongfei Lin, Peter Douglas

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetpointDynamic simulationControl theory (sociology)Steady state (chemistry)Fractionating columnPID controllerTrayDistillationController (irrigation)SimulationComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringChemistryTemperature controlControl (management)Mechanical engineeringChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A dynamic model of an MTBE (methyl tert butyl ether) catalytic distillation column was developed using the SpeedUp simulation package. Experimental kinetic rate data, rigorous thermodynamics, vapour‐liquid nonidealities and tray hydraulics were incorporated in the simulation. The steady state results from the dynamic model were compared with the steady state results from a steady state model developed using the AspenPlus simulation package. The steady state results from the two simulations were in perfect agreement with each other. Open hop step tests were performed on the dynamic model of this process and the process model indicated a non‐linear, self‐regulating behaviour and did not exhibit any multiplicities. Multiloop linear control systems were designed and PI, PID and Dynamic Matrix Control (DMC) controllers were tested on the simulation for load disturbances and setpoint changes. All controllers performed adequately; the DMC controller consistently resulted in better dynamic control performance than the other two controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral ProcessingSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207