MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080624422 · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.769

Teaching Health Information Science for Health Care Instructors

2015· article· en· W2080624422 on OpenAlexafffund
Pasquale Fiore

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaCamosun College
FundersUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsHealth careWork (physics)Health scienceFace (sociological concept)HRHISMedical educationHealth educationNursingPsychologyMedicinePublic healthSociologyPolitical scienceEngineeringSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health Information science is part of health care. Today the use of technology by health care students is relevant in all parts of their communication. How can we better prepare students wanting to work in health care to face these various technology challenges in health? How can we bring health care students to be competent, ready and comfortable enough to face the health care technology challenges in their specific field?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.351
GPT teacher head0.602
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesSame topicHealth Sciences Research and EducationFrench-language works237,207