MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080624626 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2002.0013

Feasting and Fasting: Nourishment in the Novels of Samuel Richardson

2002· article· en· W2080624626 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Sabor

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionBiographyNothingHistoryDepictionArt historySubject (documents)ClassicsLiteratureArtPhilosophyPsychologyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feasting and Fasting: Nourishment in the Novels of Samuel Richardson Peter Sabor In A Natural Passion—one of a handful of books that revitalized Richardson studies in the early 1970s—Margaret Anne Doody devotes several pages to the uses of nourishment in Pamela (1740). Contending that "both hero and heroine are fond of eating," she discusses the novel's many food-related scenes, which, she believes, "reinforce the lovers' physical and instinctual relationship." Doody adds that "there is nothing approaching this emphasis on food in the two later novels, Clarissa and Sir Charles Grandison, where relationships are more sophisticated."1 Although fasting in Clarissa has been the subject of a recent work by Donnalee Frega,2 very little has been added to Doody's remarks, published over twenty-five years ago, on nourishment in Pamela or Sir Charles Grandison. My purpose here is first to reconsider the depiction of eating and drinking in Pamela in the light ofRichardson's own dietetic concerns in the 1730s and early 1740s—before and shortly after the publication of Pamela— and then to re-examine the relationship between the treatment of 1 Margaret Anne Doody, A Natural Passion: A Study of the Novels of Samuel Richardson (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1974), pp. 50, 52. Other seminal works on Richardson published in the early 1970s are TC. Duncan Eaves and Ben D. Kimpel's still standard biography, Samuel Richardson: A Biography (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971); and Mark Kinkead-Weekes's Samuel Richardson: Dramatic Novelist (London: Routledge, 1973). 2 Donnalee Frega, SpeakinginHunger: Gender, Discourse, and Consumption in "Clarissa" (Columbia : University of South Carolina Press, 1998). See also Frega, "Speaking in Hunger: Conditional Consumption as Discourse in Clarissa," Studies in the Literary Imagination 28 (1995), 87-103. The references to nourishment in the first edition of Clarissa have been exhaustively indexed, under headings such as "food," "drink," "meals," and "collation," in Susan Price Karpuk, SamuelRichardson's "Clarissa": An Index (New York: AMS Press, 2000). EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 14, Number 2,January 2002 142EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION food in Pamela and that in Richardson's two later, more ambitious, and more complex novels. In January 1736, Edward Cave, proprietor of the Gentleman's Magazine, wrote a set ofhudibrastic verses to Richardson, urging him to attend a printer's feast. Mocking Richardson's considerable bulk, Cave assures him: I'll place two seats, whene'er you come, This for your arms—and that your bum. Cave envisages the gathering illuminated by Richardson's glowing features: Oh! could it gain your rosy face, How the full orb the board would grace, When flush'd with wine, and plump with praise! Diminish'd stars shall hide their head, Twinkle a while, then drop to bed, While you shine forth serenely bright, Restore the day in midst of night.3 Richardson's detailed self-description in a later letter to Lady Bradshaigh ,4 as well as surviving paintings byJoseph Highmore, Francis Hayman, and Mason Chamberlin,5 confirms the accuracy of Cave's portrait: he was short, plump, thick-necked, and ruddy-cheeked. Richardson's "rosy face," however, would not be present at the dinner . Pleading a prior engagement, he had declined the invitation in a verse epistle which, like Cave's, was printed in the Gentleman's Magazine. Almost five years before the publication of Pamela and twelve before the first instalment of Clarissa, the verse exchange creates a scene in which the consumption of food entails a struggle for control: one persuades, the other attempts to resist. In this case the printers will dine without Richardson, "who, pre-ingaged, can't know / The pleasures that wou'd from your meeting flow." 3 Gentleman's Magazinen (1736) , 51 . The verses were reprinted byJohn Nichols in Biographical and Literary Anecdotes of William Bowyer (London, 1782), pp. 89-90, 160; and in Literary Anecdotes oftheEighteenth Century (London, 1812-15), 2:74—79. 4 See Richardson to Lady Bradshaigh, late November (?) 1749, Selected Letters of Samuel Richardson, ed.John Carroll (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964), pp. 135-36. 5 Highmore's portraits of Richardson are at the National Portrait Gallery, London, and the Hall of the Company of Stationers; Hayman's portrait is in a private...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicLiterature: history, themes, analysisFrench-language works237,207