MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080625673 · doi:10.1139/v05-107

Synthesis and conformational analysis of disaccharide analogues containing disulfide and selenosulfide functionalities in the interglycosidic linkages

2005· article· en· W2080625673 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Nagasree Chakka, Blair D. Johnston, Bernardine M. Pinto

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryDisaccharideThio-StereochemistryDisulfide bondNucleophilePseudorotationLigand (biochemistry)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis of novel disaccharides containing disulfide (methyl-4-S-(β-D-galactopyranosyl-1'-thio)-4-thio-α-D-glucopyranoside (1)) and selenosulfide (methyl-4-Se-(β-D-galactopyranosyl-1'-thio)-4-seleno-α-D-glucopyranoside (2)) functionalities in the interglycosidic linkages is described. The synthetic strategy relied on the reaction of a β-glycosylthiosulfonate with a carbohydrate thiol or selenol nucleophile. The resulting protected β-dihetero-linked disaccharides were deprotected to give the target compounds. The conformational preferences of these dihetero analogues were inferred from NOESY experiments and line-broadening effects in variable-temperature NMR spectra, and are rationalized in terms of molecular orbital theory. Low-energy conformations of these compounds can populate regions of conformational space not usually occupied by β-linked disaccharides, and offer the possibility for presentation of novel ligand topographies.Key words: disaccharides, disulfides, selenosulfides, interglycosidic linkages, conformations, MO explanation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207