Determination of the Förster Distance in Polymer Films by Fluorescence Decay for Donor Dyes with a Nonexponential Decay Profile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments were carried out on three pairs of donor-acceptor dyes in polymer films in which the donor dyes had absorption maxima in the range of 350-450 nm. Two of the donors, a coumarin dye and a naphthalimide dye covalently bound to polystyrene, gave nonexponential decays in the absence of acceptors. The decay profiles could be fitted to a stretched exponential form with a beta value on the order of 0.9. We developed equations for analyzing donor fluorescence intensity decay profiles for donor-acceptor mixtures in rigid matrices for the case of donors showing relatively small deviations from exponentiality. To test these equations, we calculate values of the Förster radius (R0(FR)) from the decay profile data and compare these values to the Förster radius R0(SO) determined by the traditional spectral overlap method. Agreement between these values validates the methodology developed here for the use of such donor dyes in FRET studies of more complex polymer systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".