MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080641454 · doi:10.1086/380483

On the Structure of Quasi‐universal Jets for Gamma‐Ray Bursts

2004· article· en· W2080641454 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole Lloyd-Ronning, Xinyu Dai, Bing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGamma-ray burstPhysicsAfterglowJet (fluid)Viewing angleAstrophysicsGaussianPower lawLight curveIsotropyFunction (biology)Statistical physicsOpticsMechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea that gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) originate from uniform jets has been used to explain numerous observations of breaks in the GRB afterglow light curves. We explore the possibility that GRBs instead originate from a structured jet that may be quasi-universal, where the variation in the observed properties of GRBs is due to the variation in the observer viewing angle. We test how various models reproduce the jet data of Bloom, Frail, & Kulkarni, which show a negative correlation between the isotropic energy output and the inferred jet opening angle (in a uniform jet configuration). We find, consistent with previous studies, that a power-law structure for the jet energy as a function of angle gives a good description. However, a Gaussian jet structure can also reproduce the data well, particularly if the parameters of the Gaussian are allowed some scatter. We place limits on the scatter of the parameters in both the Gaussian and power-law models needed to reproduce the data and discuss how future observations will better distinguish between these models for the GRB jet structure. We also discuss the predictions each model makes for the observed luminosity function of GRBs and compare these predictions with the existing data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207