MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080676570 · doi:10.1063/1.4753861

Estimating cell temperature in a concentrating photovoltaic system

2012· article· en· W2080676570 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemSolar cellTemperature measurementVoltageDiodeThermalPower (physics)Materials scienceMaximum power principleOperating pointEquivalent circuitOpen-circuit voltageJunction temperatureOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringMechanicsPhysicsThermodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A temperature calibrated equivalent circuit model of a high efficiency CPV solar cell is used to simulate a measured six-cell module J-V curve to estimate its average operating temperature. The simulation is based on a two diode equivalent circuit model for each subcell of a representative triple junction cell. Module J-V curves in a real CPV system were measured with a test station that performs continuous voltage sweeps allowing cells to reach a well defined thermal equilibrium during measurement. The average electrical power extracted during measurement is then used to determine the cell temperature when they are operating at their maximum power point. It is shown that the cells would operate at 42 ± 2 C° above ambient (32 ± 2°C abs.) given the ambient conditions during the measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it