Asynchronous seismic analysis of concrete-faced rockfill dams including dam–reservoir interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seismic response of concrete-faced rockfill (CFR) dams subjected to asynchronous base excitation is determined by considering dam–reservoir interaction. The equations of motion of the coupled system are obtained using the Lagrangian approach, and the surface sloshing motion is included in the finite element formulation. Torul dam constructed in the city, Gumushane, Turkey, is selected as a numerical example, and its material properties are considered in the analysis. The dam–reservoir interaction system is modelled using the Lagrangian (displacement-based) fluid and solid-quadrilateral-isoparametric finite elements. The east–west component of Erzincan earthquake, which occurred on 13 March 1992, recorded near the region of the dam is used as a ground motion. Propagation velocities of the seismic wave are chosen as 1000 m/s, 3000 m/s, and infinite. Stresses are calculated for empty and full reservoir cases and compared with each other.Key words: concrete-faced rockfill dam, Lagrangian approach, dam–reservoir interaction, finite element method, earthquake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".