MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080677976 · doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0012

Quantitative 177 Lu SPECT (QSPECT) imaging using a commercially available SPECT/CT system

2011· article· en· W2080677976 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Mathieu Beauregard, Michael S. Hofman, Jucilene Maria Pereira, Peter Eu, Rodney J. Hicks

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Imaging · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversité Laval
FundersState Government of VictoriaUniversité LavalVictorian Cancer AgencyVanderbilt University
KeywordsImaging phantomNuclear medicineCorrection for attenuationSingle-photon emission computed tomographyAttenuationMedicineIterative reconstructionTomographyDosimetryPhysicsPositron emission tomographyRadiologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The combination of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computer tomography (CT) that incorporates iterative reconstruction algorithms with attenuation and scatter correction should facilitate accurate non-invasive quantitative imaging. Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) may improve diagnostic ability and could be useful for many applications including dosimetry assessment. Using (177)Lu, we developed a QSPECT method using a commercially available SPECT/CT system. METHODS: Serial SPECT of (177)Lu sources (89-12,400 MBq) were acquired with multiple contiguous energy windows along with a co-registered CT, and were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm with attenuation and scatter correction. Camera sensitivity (based on reconstructed SPECT count rate) and dead-time (based on wide-energy spectrum count rate) were resolved by non-linear curve fit. Utilizing these parameters, a SPECT dataset can be converted to a QSPECT dataset allowing quantitation in Becquerels per cubic centimetre or standardized uptake value (SUV). Validation QSPECT/CT studies were performed on a (177)Lu cylindrical phantom (7 studies) and on 5 patients (6 studies) who were administered a therapeutic dose of [(177)Lu]octreotate. RESULTS: The QSPECT sensitivity was 1.08 x 10(-5) ± 0.02 x 10(-5) s(-1) Bq(-1). The paralyzing dead-time constant was 0.78 ± 0.03 µs. The measured total activity with QSPECT deviated from the calibrated activity by 5.6 ± 1.9% and 2.6 ± 1.8%, respectively, in phantom and patients. Dead-time count loss up to 11.7% was observed in patient studies. CONCLUSION: QSPECT has high accuracy both in our phantom model and in clinical practice following [(177)Lu]octreotate therapy. This has the potential to yield more accurate dosimetry estimates than planar imaging and facilitate therapeutic response assessment. Validating this method with other radionuclides could open the way for many other research and clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ImagingSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207