Interaction of NO<sub>2</sub> with Hydrocarbon Soot: Focus on HONO Yield, Surface Modification, and Mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a coated-wall flow tube connected to a mass spectrometer, the heterogeneous conversion of NO2 to HONO on dry hydrocarbon soot surfaces has been studied at room temperature and 243 K. Particular attention was given to the measurement of the HONO yield as a function of hydrocarbon fuel, NO2 partial pressure, extent of uptake, and surface oxidation state. In all cases, the yield is invariant of these parameters and close to unity, indicative of an irreversible oxidation mechanism by which the NO2 abstracts an H atom from the surface. XPS analysis shows that the surface N content does not measurably increase with NO2 exposure. There is minimal surface reactivity regeneration with time or via exposure to high relative humidity. A BET surface area measurement of the entire soot film exposed to NO2 was used to determine the amount of HONO that can be generated from the soot surface per unit surface area, prior to its deactivation. The reduction of NO2 to HONO on soot is unlikely to account for the observed nighttime buildup of HONO in polluted urban environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".