Photoluminescence from Chitosan for Bio-Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photoluminescent behaviours of chitosan were investigated. Photoluminescence can be observed from aqueous solution of chitosan, and CO2 treatment can improve the intensity of photoluminescence. The maximum emission is obtained with an excitation at ~336 nm, and the emission wavelength is dependent on the excitation wavelength with a longer excitation wavelength leading to a longer emission wavelength. The chemistry of chitosan before and after CO2 treatment was characterised; and the results reflect that carbamato anion is formed via the reaction between the amines and CO2, and is the fluorophore of the photoluminescence observed. Furthermore, chitosan was applied as an imaging agent for imaging MCF-7 cells using confocal microscopy. Blue and bright green imaging of the cells can be obtained via tuning the excitation and emission wavelength. Together with a low cytotoxicity reflected by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide evaluation, fluorescent chitosan is promising for bio-imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".