MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080702078 · doi:10.1172/jci18237

The fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 is a key mediator of atherogenesis

2003· letter· en· W2080702078 on OpenAlexaff
Myron I. Cybulsky, Robert A. Hegele

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Investigation · 2003
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCX3CR1MediatorKey (lock)ReceptorCell biologyChemistryMedicineComputational biologyBiologyChemokine receptorInternal medicineChemokineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recruitment of circulating monocytes to the arterial intima contributes to the formation of atherosclerotic lesions and may participate in their destabilization. Leukocyte emigration from blood into tissues is mediated by multiple adhesion molecules and chemokines, which orchestrate specific steps of emigration and regulate preferential recruitment of different leukocytes depending on their expression patterns of chemokine receptors. Over the last several years, a number of adhesion molecules, including VCAM-1, P-selectin and ICAM-1, the chemokines MCP-1 (also known as CCL2) and IL-8 (also known as CXCL8), and their respective receptors CCR2 and CXCR2, have been functionally implicated in atherosclerosis. Two studies — one recently published in the JCI (1), and the second reported in this issue (2) — expand this list to include the chemokine receptor CX3CR1, the receptor for fractalkine (also known as CX3CL1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical InvestigationSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207