MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080746622 · doi:10.1002/chp.20036

More than mingling: The potential of networks in facilitating knowledge translation in health care

2009· article· en· W2080746622 on OpenAlexaff
Mandi Newton, Anne Hofmeyer, Cathie Scott, Donna Angus, Christa Harstall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomedical and Engineering Education
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Health EconomicsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnowledge translationTranslation (biology)Health careMedicinePsychologyKnowledge managementComputer sciencePolitical scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Newton, Mandi S. PhD, RN; Hofmeyer, Anne T. PhD, RN; Scott, Cathie PhD; Angus, Donna BEd, MSA; Harstall, Christa MHSA Author Information

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.105
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.105
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.026
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Continuing Education in the Health ProfessionsSame topicBiomedical and Engineering EducationFrench-language works237,207