MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080830613 · doi:10.1080/00207170500101706

Observer-based control of discrete-time Lipschitzian non-linear systems: application to one-link flexible joint robot

2005· article· en· W2080830613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Link (geometry)MathematicsLinear matrix inequalityLipschitz continuityExponential stabilityLinear systemController (irrigation)Stability (learning theory)Computer scienceControl (management)Nonlinear systemMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of designing asymptotic observers along with observer-based feedbacks for a class of discrete-time non-linear systems is considered. We assume that the system non-linearity is globally Lipschitz and the system is supposed to be stabilizable by a linear controller. Sufficient linear matrix inequality condition is derived to ensure the stability of the considered system under the action of feedback control based on the reconstructed states. A numerical example of a single-link flexible joint robot is presented to illustrate the efficacy of the theoretical developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it