Sorbent-Impregnated Polyurethane Foam Disk for Passive Air Sampling of Volatile Fluorinated Chemicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A passive air sampler comprising a polyurethane foam (PUF) disk impregnated with XAD-4 powder has been developed. This sorbent-impregnated PUF (SIP) disk builds on previous work using PUF disk passive air samplers that have been effective in spatial air mapping studies of nonpolar hydrophobic chemicals, without the need of electricity or expensive air sampling equipment. In this study, PUF disks and SIP disks are calibrated for sampling volatile polyfluorinated chemicals--specifically, the fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) and perfluoroalkyl sulfonamides (PFASs). Results demonstrate the low sorptive capacity of the PUF disk samplers, particularly for the FTOHs, with PUF disks reaching equilibrium within 1 day, after collecting approximately 0.4 and 1.2 m3 of air for 8:2 FTOH and 10:2 FTOH, respectively. This limits their use for these target compounds when time-weighted, linear-phase sampling is desired. The presence of just 0.4 g of XAD powder in the SIP disks greatly increases the sorptive capacity (by approximately 2 orders of magnitude for the FTOHs) and provides linear-phase sampling for a period of several weeks. PUF-air partition coefficients, KPUF-A, calculated for the FTOHs and PFASs are considerably lower than values predicted using previously established correlations against the octanol-air partition coefficient, KOA, demonstrating the unique partitioning behavior of the polyfluorinated chemicals. Using results from these calibration tests, air concentrations of FTOHs were derived from PUF disk samples that were deployed in 52 homes in Ottawa, Canada, during 2002/2003. These represent the first comprehensive measurements of FTOHs in indoor air in North America. Range and (geometric mean) air concentrations (pg m-3) were 261-28 900 (2070) for 8:2 FTOH and 104-9210 (890) for 10:2 FTOH. These air concentrations are orders of magnitude higher than observed for outdoor air, establishing indoor environments as important for human exposure and also as potential sources to the larger environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".